MiamiFloridaBabii ( talk) 19:29, (UTC) Īnd do not change the chart performance as I said below I have good and reliable sources. It appears as if you dislike Usher and/or the album personally.
#Usher albums raymond vs raymond full
What makes them top critics? And you gave a full negative review which is not necessary and without a positive one. You committed vandalism and are not in charge of the page. It is not necessary to show both attitudes/criticism, but to have the template reflect on most top critics' reception. 2½ out of 4 star-ratings and the B- are lukewarm but generally positive. Thank you- MiamiFloridaBabii ( talk) 10:41, (UTC) There is only one negative review, Slant Magazine's, in the template. You need to show both the positive and the negative. As it said the album received mixed reviews. Then, Now Magazine, Boston Herald, Entertainment Weekly, and the Los Angeles Times for the positive reviews. The Chicago Tribune, Pop Matters, Rolling Stone, The Times and USA Today for the negative and mixed reviews. The scale where it shows reviews had previously shown mostly the negative reviews so I just added three positive reviews to balance it out. Cut it short and sweet because you can't just give a negative full album review and not a positive. Another thing don't show the full review. I believe usually there are only suppose to be 10 reviews. Look everybody the album has enough reviews. I've given up trying to figure out which one is better: so long as there's a redirect at one pointing at the other, I won't object.- Kww( talk) 17:37, 11 April 2010 (UTC) Album Reviews All the Hung Medien sites and Billboard list it as "Raymond v Raymond". uses both "Raymond v Raymond" and "Raymond v. Ill get on it right away :) thank you Texasmade2010 ( talk) 17:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Yvesnimmo ( talk) 02:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC) US site has it with the period. Thoughts? - Yvesnimmo ( talk) 02:52, 11 April 2010 (UTC) Whoops, I meant Raymond v. The official website of Usher has it mentioned as Raymond v Raymond as well. The cover art says Raymond v Raymond, as well as the iTunes store at and the canada link from the official Usher website It fetures 3 rappers on the album so will hip-hop be valid?- Louis Taylor ( talk) 13:00, (UTC) Title: Raymond v Raymond or Raymond vs Raymond 8 Edit request from Royalplaid1234, 27 August 2010.2 Title: Raymond v Raymond or Raymond vs Raymond.
You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser. PliesĪudio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. It just doesn’t sound like the catchy Usher that I was used to hearing in the early 00’s. I have included three songs that will be on the next album, but if they are respresentative of the standard on the rest of the album then i’m glad it has been pushed back, there is definitely more work to do. Luckily for him, he seems to have the powerhouses of production in his corner for this album, they include: Jermaine Dupri, Ne-Yo, The Neptunes, Polow da Don, RedOne, Dre & Vidal, Danja, The Runners, Tricky Stewart, Jazze Pha and T-Pain. If he doesn’t there is a chance that he could fade away into mediocrity. He will need to register more first week sales than his last album so that he can maintain his status as a major force in the music industry. I think this album is critcal to his future success. This must have come as a shock to Usher as prior to that his career was only going upwards. Confessions shipped over 1.1m copies in the first week of its release compared with only (haha) 433k copies of Here I Stand. In my opinion Here I Stand was a pretty impressive album, although it didn’t seem to resonate with the buying public. al) want to give it the opportunity to have the proper setup before coming out”. Apparantly it was delayed because “the album is so strong that we (Usher et. Raymond is the title of Ushers next studio album which was initally supposed to be released before the turn of the year.
0 kommentar(er)
